Hi Jane.Gu,
What is the exact difference between row 110 and 111?
And row 112 and row 113?
For me, they look the same.
Can you explain a bit?
Many thanks,
Ludwig
Hi Jane.Gu,
What is the exact difference between row 110 and 111?
And row 112 and row 113?
For me, they look the same.
Can you explain a bit?
Many thanks,
Ludwig
That makes sense. I guess it would be good practice then to create new models inside your own package when you need to interface with other packages. This isolates the code that is dependant on the referenced package to exist.
Looking at standard now, it is full of examples that work like this... :) I seem to always have had the cart before the horse in my mind. Thanks... I really got a whole new (correct) perspective on this today.
Not a pressing issue... but I was wondering....
Since overlayering is quickly on its way out, does it serve any purpose to still create a model inside an existing package? As I cannot think of any technical benefit you gain from doing that. You would be able to achieve the same, by just creating another package, that references both your package and the one you need to integrate with. Is this just a legacy left over from the overlayering days?
One advantage I could maybe think of, is that it creates a better overview of which code belongs where... am I missing something? Is there a specific reason not to make a model inside an existing package, or vice versa, a good reason to do? Maybe I am missing something obvious in the late afternoon ;)
Interested in your thoughts
Wessel
Thanks Yohann
I read somewhere on another article, that when the delivery note posts for items with disposition code SCRAP, a quarantine order is created in the system (opened and then closed).
Where would I setup the quarantine order setups?
Hi Ludwig,
YES, row 110 is the same with 111, and row 112 and row 113 is same.
Thanks
Hi Ludwig,
Thanks for your responses,
My client want to make report that based on main account, he want to drill down all amount per main account but there's a column that explain what main account category that used by that per main account, so i can't using main account categories in row definition, any idea for this issue?
Thanks,
Christoper
Dear all AX experts,
my client want to make a reports in management reporter like this :
i have already make all column except column "Mapping FS Classification" that is the account category of the main account
This is the column definition :
and this is the row definition :
i think i can using column "ATTR" with attribute category = "Account Category" but it doesn't work, it's not showing anything
Can anyone help me to solve this?
Thanks,
Christoper
Hi Yohann
Let me open a new KB query for this one.. I think its a bit more in-depth
I was going to say that if by any chance you where using the retail module... You could find the solution here.
Indeed, if you have 500 different combination it won't work only with supplementary item.
Try to use the retail by configuring a call center as a channel (you won't need the POS in that case but its a big choice to make)... not easy.
Try otherwise to use the trade allowance option by using the off invoice promotion... But it won't be enough, you probably will need customizations.
This problem occur when a sourcedocumentline doesn't exists, for the PO line... If you need to solve the problem urgently, in production environment, you can recreate the PO line that are having this problem, or clear the field purchline.sourcedocumentline and edit any information at the line, on PO forms (just to call the modify), this will recreate the sourcedocumentline!
If it not work, probably the customizations are impacting your process!
Hello i want to credit note just amount not quantity. like i want to less my net amount, quantity in line is 1.
kindly suggest me how can i do it?????
Hi,
Is it possible that you share some additional details about your sales tax setup?
What is interesting are especially
- Whether your sales tax codes have a non-deductibe % Setup in the value form?
- Whether your sales tax groups have the use tax parameter setup? A doubling of the amounts indicates that there might be something related to reverse charge postings?!
- What main accounts have been setup in your sales tax ledger posting Groups.
Any additional setup info would help because it is quite difficult giving you some concrete hints from the posted transactions alone.
Many thanks and best regards,
Ludwig
Dear All,
We are facing a strange behavior when running the settle and post sales tax declaration.
There are multiple booking on the Sales tax code "Full". The sales tax code has a nothing special to it. No reverse charge no use tax regarding the sales tax group that is set up to it.
We have invoices booked through the project and through free text invoice. The VAT set up the same in both cases.
The VAT calculation is correct on both of the invoices.
Freetext invoice sales tax voucher
Project invoice voucher
When creating the sale tax settlement, for some reason all the booking are correct expect for the ones relating relating to the free text invoices.
Main account 480200 is the Value added tax, 480100 is the Prepaid tax, 480000 is the vat liability
After the VAT settlement the main account 480200 is not 0, the remaining value comes from the freetext invoice VAT amount which are doubled. And are not settled in the correct direction.
Here is one of the invoices and their VAT booking and VAT settlement
I would be grateful if any one could give some pointers what could be causing this.
Hello Christoper,
Further above, you have the account category specified in column C as an attribute. If you open your report and drill down to the transactions, can't you see the main account category?
If you can't, can you verify whether the main account categories are linked to your main accounts in the COA?
Best regards,
Ludwig
Hi Guys,
In AX09 when we open PO Confirmation form,
we can see overview,setup and lines tab . (table behind is purchparmlines)
but ax in ax 2012, it is not standard. even parm lines are creating form purchformletterparmdata class.
whereas in ax09 puchformletter class was directly having method of createparmline and crateparmtable .
It needs to be customized but i m not sure exactly where should i be done.
Hi Guys,
When I am creating PO, records are getting created in purchtable.
PurchParmTable and PurchParmLine contains detailed information regarding posting Purchase headers and Lines.
So actually at what stage it is creating record in purchparmtable and purchparmline, Where it is written to insert records in these parm tables.
Thanks for repling..
We compiled without erroers.
Thanks a lot.