Thank you. I guess there is no way around it for SQL.
↧
RE: Container Data Type SQL
↧
RE: Enterprise Portal show me empty alwyas
thanks for replay
just for information i have sharepoint2013 foundation is that problem?!
↧
↧
RE: Cust Aging report processing time improvement
Instead of running the Customer aging snapshot ) in 1 batch for all involved customer, split your customers into separate pools and run 1 batch per pool on dedicated AOS batch servers.
Check out this post fro a possible customisation of customer bundle size used by the process: community.dynamics.com/.../shorter-customer-aging-snapshot-batch-run-times-using-smarter-bundle-sizes
↧
RE: Container Data Type SQL
You are welcome. Correct, there is no way around it for SQL.
↧
RE: Hyperlinks to AX2012 in Excel
What 's stopping you from making the same query / while select in AX (required for the Report) ?
↧
↧
RE: Table inheritance
Let me react to some points. By the way, when you say you got an error, it would help if you said what error it was.
2. Yes, the meaning is the same as in OOP. 'Abstract' means that the table isn't intended to have instances; you need a non-abstract child to create an instance.
4. There is just a single record in DB with one set of ModifiedBy, ModifiedDateTime (etc.) fields, therefore setting it up several times wouldn't be useful.
6. Yes, I don't see any reason why it would have to add any fields. But I don't understand what you're trying to achieve and your explanations sounds suspicious to me. If B may be something else than B (B != list of B), does the whole design make sense?
↧
RE: AX 2009: Questionnaire->How 'Not Applicable' responses can be handled?
↧
AX 2009: Questionnaire->How 'Not Applicable' responses can be handled?
Hi,
I have designed a simple questionnaire with 3 Close-ended questions. The responses to all of them are 'N/A, 1, 2' where response type is 'alternative'. I need to put points against these responses. The total possible score of entire questionnaire can be 6.
Response '1' has a score 1 and '2' has a score 2. 'N/A' means 'Not Applicable'. What option can I use of AX 2009->Questionnaire by which when a user selects 'N/A', the question is totally ruled out of total questionnaire score? Example, user selected 'N/A' for q1 and q2 and '2' for q3. I want the results to show me total possible score of 2 and achieved score of 2 against this particulare questionnaire.
I will be really grateful for some help/advice.
regards,
Asad
↧
RE: Enterprise Portal show me empty alwyas
For AX2012R3 the SharePoint2013 or Foundation2013 is fully supported. For R2 or earlier versions of AX, you need to apply one of the two updates (technet.microsoft.com/.../dn169057.aspx)
So, i don't think using SharePoint 2013 is a reason.
Do you mind uploading a screenshot of "Accounting Manager" profile,..?
↧
↧
RE: Not able to edit the Default financial dimensions for Main account screen
Hi Ludwig,
that user having system administrator role, strangely but one more user having same role he can able to edit. not sure why ?
Regards
Guru
↧
RE: Integrate Microsoft Dynamics AX with Woocommerce
Sorry but I think you might have a hard time getting an answer for a question like this, its simply to broad a question.
So you properly need to be more specific, perhaps read this post (link)
↧
Integrate Microsoft Dynamics AX with Woocommerce
Hi,
How to Integrate Microsoft Dynamics AX with Woocommerce.
Need links for documentation
Thanks in Advance
↧
RE: Hyperlinks to AX2012 in Excel
The main reason is that I do not know how to do it, where to start, or even if I could do it. Whereabouts on AX would I do this please?
↧
↧
RE: AX7: What made Microsoft to keep some elements Non-Extensible
Hi
Palle Agermark,
The above idea of yours worked . but a warning is like "salesquotationstatus enum will have upgradation issues". For the time being your idea worked for removal of compilation errors in other classes
↧
AX7: What made Microsoft to keep some elements Non-Extensible
With arrival of AX7, as we have got two approaches of development, a new development approach i.e. Extension allows us to extend AOT Elements.
For each element there is a property called isExtensible, which is either false or true.
Incase isExtensible=false, for an AOT element, that element cannot be extended.
An example let’s take a base enumeration LedgerTransTxt, which is part of Application Suite. Because of any reason such as for any of my ISV solution, I may think to extend this Base Enum, but I cannot extend it, as it is set to isExtensible=false
My question is simply, what made Microsoft to keep some elements extendable whereas other non-extendable?
↧
RE: Batch Transfer rules for Subledger journal account entries and changing Transfer mode to Synchronous
Hi,
Before moving from scheduled batch to synchronous,
You need to post the vouchers by the function general ledger/Periodic/batch transfer for subledger journals
↧
Batch Transfer rules for Subledger journal account entries and changing Transfer mode to Synchronous
Hi all,
We have an environment where the setup already has a Batch transfer rule of type 'Company', Applying on 'All' (Source document type = All) and with Transfer mode = Scheduled batch.
We now want to change this for Transfer mode = "Synchronous", which will basically transfer source document sub-ledger journal entries to the general ledger immediately.
May I know if there are implications of doing so with some existing entries? I presume No but just wanted to be careful.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Cheers,
Asim
↧
↧
RE: How to build proper container from the bulk location?
Guys, any ideas?
↧
How to build proper container from the bulk location?
Hi All,
I'm working on containerization in AX 2012 R3, CU13 and faced with unexpected behavior which I can't fix.
I have the following scenario:
Sales order for 10 Pallets of the Product A;
there are 10 pallets of the Product A in the BULK location;
every physical pallet of the Product A fits container type of "STD-Pallet"
location directive works fine and identifies BULK location as "Pick" location for all 10 Pallets;
SO work template has maximum unit = 1 Pallet, so the result of wave processing is 10 Work orders for every 1 pallet from BULK location.
BUT, all these works have the same Container ID, which of course has error as the container type of "STD-Pallet" could be assigned only per 1 physical pallet by physical dimension.
Setup.
Container build template :
1) Pack by unit and Allow split pick == FALSE
2) Container packing strategy == Pack into current container only
3) Mixing logic breaks == Shipment Id
Container group has only one container type.
For non-bulk locations (one Licence plate per location) everything works fine.
Could you please help me to identify the reason of such containerization issue?
↧
RE: Table inheritance
Thank you very much Martin, much appreciated.
2,4: Thanks for the confirmation
5: This is my main issue. Let me try to put it straight forward:
SCENARIO
Parent table P exists. Abstract table B is a child of P by RefRecID. Table D is a concrete descendant of B.
QUESTION
If I add table P and table D to a form and join D to B (with the FornDataSource property Join Source), should it work (as it does with "normal" tables)?
6: I'm still working on that commission add-on. So for a commission policy the user may add the following types: Constants, Variables (worker salary), Datasets (transaction revenue), Equations, Grid (in order to simulate excel INDEX and MATCH functions exceljet.net/index-and-match ). All five of the types are elements and should have a unique name. So I have a abstract base table XYZElement with significant fields CommissionPolicyRefRec and ElementName (Unique Index). And then descendant tables Constants, Variables, Datsets, Equations have the applicable extra fields.
The grid descendant is the one I was referring to. If we ignore the mentioned hierarchy at first: A grid would be defined by two tables XYZGrid with fields CommissionPolicyRefRec & GridName and then child XYZGridLines with fields ReferenceString and lookupValue. Then it seems clear to me that XYZPolicyGrid should be a descendant of XYZElement - but then it has zero fields.
Does that make sense or would you do it differently?
↧