The inventory transactions behind the sales lines have had the "Split" functionality in all versions so far, it should be in D365fO as well. Can't you make it that way that you see your original sales line with Qty 100, and then you just do a split of the on order transaction behind, with which you can have 60+40 in the background using Standard AX, with no possibility to lose the original record quantity?
If you still want to split the sales line itself, that would require development.
how can i split sales order line in dynamics 365 for operation ?
How guys,
I posted a few Retail statements but with a completely wrong configuration on Posting profiles. Is there a way to reverse/roll it back so I can post it again? (I'm in a test environment).
Thx, Mauro.
No, there is no such functionality. AX moves more along the lines of how relational databases work. So if you raise a Purchase order from a Sales order, then the linked record holds a reference to the original records. See the last Notes section in the documentation:
technet.microsoft.com/.../aa498365.aspx
However, it is very easy to customize AX and create additional fields, which can be carried forward for various business processes between different records, modules, postings.
Hi, Does Dynamics AX have a document Master Number reference like in Dynamics GP?
(Master Number is a separate number that is common to a quote, order, invoice. That does not change as it moves from one type to the other)
Are you facing this error in CU11.As i am also facing this error and unable to find a solution for it.
HI All
i have issue with Transfer order
i'm trying to print report
Inventory management/Periodic/Transfer Orders / Print / Transfer Overview
show me #Error inside Report
Hi Adriaan, Check the On-Hand inventory for that item and look at the Available for Reservation which is what matters because what is available for Reservation is available for new Production orders. You can confirm that the Safety Stock of 750 does not reserve any stock.
In your case, the "Period" Coverage did what it is meant to do. You should consider reducing the Coverage Period; (eg. If you want one PO every week, reduce the period to 7 days); If you do so, every week, MRP will suggest an order to cover the week's demand so that you finish the Period at the Minimum stock.
But may a MinMax coverage is more the type of trigger that you want. With MinMax, on reaching the level identified as minimum stock on this Item's coverage, MRP will suggest a planned purchase to bring your stock to the value identified as maximum stock. As long as your planning horizon (Coverage Time Fence) is higher than this item's 5 days lead time, MRP will consider all demand that horizon and recommend a purchase when it anticipates that stock going below that Min. MRP will try to maintain that MinMax balance.
Hi. We are using Dynamics AX 2012.
We've been confonted with the problem described in the article by Jacob Roder: https://community.dynamics.com/ax/b/axmrpjakeroder/archive/2015/12/01/i-have-on-hand-inventory-let-me-use-it and I've seen some posts from Timsaxblog on this subject as well, but didn't find the solution yet.
The safety stock is blocking use of an item which is on-hand, causing all the planned orders to fall after the fulfillment of the safety stock.
If I change the fulfillment setting to "Today's date + procurement time", this doesn't solve the problem completely, I guess because the procurement time (7 days) is set up shorter than the real delivery lead time (about 3 months) as confirmed by an order. However, there is no need to speed up the order, as we still have a large stock available.
The problem is that all planned orders which need to use this item are now planned after 3 months, causing us to see unrealistically long lead times.
Setting the fulfillment parameter to "Coverage time fence" solves that problem, but now the planned order for replenishment of the safety stock is pushed all the way to the end of the coverage time fence, which is 365 days away.
What do you suggest?
Hi Derek,
Indeed, it may be a different view. I assumed you did lookup the correct one. If you right click on the form, you can choose in the pop-up menu Form information> Form name: ..... Then on the slider window open the Administration fast tab for datasource information.
Or the link may not be recognized correctly
Hi,
You could use data import/export framework to update records when you have a source file with required changes.
Can anyone tell me how to change all a property within a released product for multiple released products? I want to set "Must Key in Quantity" for multiple items.
The answer is above. You should separately re-run the initialization of number sequence references. In a new fresh environment it will work directly.
I need help!!!
How to create a new area reference for number sequence?
Thanks for any suggestion
I believe you must have done the IC mappings as without that system won't create header as well. I would recommend to verify mappings for line level columns and also check used items are released in that company properly. Let us know if you are getting any error.
Hi Experts,
I am trying to create an intercompany PO from a sales order. System is creating an intercompany PO; but, without lines. Only header details are populated in the PO.
Could there be any setting I missed?
Thanks,
N.Sridhar
Hi Brandt Fundak
There might be data that is being update or delete which belongs to other legal Entity (Company). So, get into that method to see what data is being Updated (Update, Deleted).
Regards.
Kumar
We are experiencing a strange error when attempting to call the updateReservation() method of an InventMovement object. If the item that is in the InventMovement object has an OnOrder quantity in the InventSum table, we receive the following error:
Cannot edit a record in Order Lines (SalesLine). Cannot call NEXT, update() or delete() on buffer where data is selected or inserted in another transaction scope.
It turns out that the InventUpd_Reservation.updateNow() method is not called unless the item is OnOrder. However, after checking the calling class, which is a custom class I created, I do not see anywhere else that we access that SalesLine in any transaction scope. The InventMov_Sales object is not created until right before we call the updateReservation() method and the InventUpd_Reservation object is passed the existing InventMov_Sales object via the InventUpd_Reservation::newMovement() static method. I thought perhaps that InventUpd_Reservation was creating a new InventMovement object, thus causing the error, but it doesn't--it uses the same one.
Does anyone have any idea why this might be happening?
Brandt
Hi Iwona,
The reason why the field is not in the overview list, is because it is a display method. Unfortunately it is not possible to drag the control to another tab page.
Note that the MorphX technology which was used in the AX2012 client has been fully replaced with html and java. The personalization options are rebuild from scratch. It would be possible to use e.g. Microsoft Connect to provide feedback.
This may be relevant to other screens as this is a personalisation question.
In AX2012 I was able to move 'Approved By' field from the Invoice tab to the front screen of the journal(Group Overview - bottom of the page in the Overview tab).
In AX7 (Dynamics 365, Dynamics 365O) I would be moving this field from the Invoice tab to the List tab - Group Overview. But either I am doing it incorrectly (personalise-drag the field onto the List tab - just like you would move a file into a folder) or you cannot move this field any more.
So, any ideas how to make Approved By field appear in the Group Overview - List tab in the Purch. Invoice Journal?